Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection. 14, awaiting reviewer selection.

Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I didnt see the "under review You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed Peer review process. After making the necessary changes, I submitted the manuscript. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Last month, I sent an e-mail to the administrator, and I received response which said "Senior editor will respond to your query". Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! So, we have made some edits/assumptions. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if your submission I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Commented Apr 19 What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. This change has occurred Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. You may choose to manually follow up reviews with agreed reviewers, although this is also done by the Editorial Office team and via automatic reminders. Role of the journal editor. Some will forcefully invite a major revision to be submitted for review and review, and some will be directly decided by the editorial department after revision. Commented Mar 14, 2022 at 2:51. " Does this My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. The label and the steps of the various "status" you read on scholarone manuscript are journal-specific. Awaiting reviewers decision 5. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Answered by Editage Insights on 09 May, 2019 . Some editorial systems give the I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Now back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" the status updates in this system couldn't be more confusing. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. On the last step I’ve seen it stay for months because some DEs are sitting on the paper. This may, however, vary across journals. Liu O, Wang J, Ma J, et al. 13. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. But the editor, for some reason, e. I just thought after all reviewer scores, Editor here. Awaiting Editor Decision After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". 3. 1010 awaiting reviewer scores 6. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced AE stands for Associate Editor. I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. 15. This is a specific substep of the review cycle. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Does it mean the manuscript is already under review? Hopefully, good luck! I have two questions. I have previously published in the same journal I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. " 2023. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed reviewer selection. The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. Crossref. the second one was 'awaiting eic assignment' and now it says 'awaiting ae assignment'. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. 2. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. So, why has it returned to 4 Assign Reviewers & Awaiting Reviewer Scores Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. But today suddenly the status changed back to I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. Answer Why would manuscript status change from "awaiting reviewer decisions" to "evaluation requests sent to reviewers"? Ask Question Asked 8 years, 9 months Review is pending 4. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Ditolak 2. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Awaiting Reviewer Scores My paper underwent a revision. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Go to your SAGE Track journal’s login page 1. You may learn more through this similar related query: What does the journal status "Awaiting reviewer reply" mean? I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. 0925 awaiting ed assignment 4. Sometimes it is sent to original reviewers, sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. The status of the paper changed several times. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. Awaiting Editor Decision It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. The Action Editor may decide to make a peer review process and the Action Editor has decided that it would be suitable for publication after Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that consideration. 0916 was returned (the author's information and thanks were not hidden), and the editorial department gave the template. 1104 awaiting ed recommendation 7. 11 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist b9d3. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the matter a bit. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. How long should I wait? Should I be more What the Best Awaiting Reviewer Selection Vs Awaiting Reviewer Assignment Pros Do (and You Should Too) Dash to the action items or search by wildcards Use wildcards to search manuscripts. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. So I just wonder why it was returned to the AE again – notfunnyatall. Search In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. " Are you sure the status is “Awaiting reader selection” and not “Awaiting reviewer selection”? If it’s the latter, you can rest assured that your paper has cleared the initial editorial screening. Do not email to ask about I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. Explore Stories Search. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. Google Scholar. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Ah well! – MHL. بطوریکه ابتدا awaiting reviewer selection و بعد awaiting reviewer agreement و بعد به awaiting reviewer Invitation تغییر کرده و تا بحال حداقل سه بار هر کدام از این جملات در طول مدت یک ماه تکرار شده و الان مجددا برای Journal Selection. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). 14, awaiting reviewer selection. Answered by Editage Insights on 21 Dec, 2021 . Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. I submitted a paper to a journal. " The assignment of appropriate reviewers to academic articles, known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP), has become a crucial issue in academia. Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. Comput Ind 2016; 76: 1–10. A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. If a manuscript does not have enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Peer Review in Progress. A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. It seems to have skipped 'awaiting referee assignment' -> 'awaiting referee scores'. g. For Review and selection of manuscripts. Securing Research Funding. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. ’) So, great, that’s one step cleared in the submission/publication process! aims to provide a curated selection of innovative and important research outcomes in the chemical sciences from around the globe. Awaiting ME I submitted my paper on June 24 and after few comments from the admin on the paper files I resubmitted the paper. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. 5. 当您看到稿件状态显示为"等待分配审稿人（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment/Selection）"时，这意味着您的论文正处在审稿过程的初期阶段。 投稿后，首先会经过编辑的初步筛选，只有当论文符合期刊的接收标准且确保原创性，编辑才会进入寻找审稿人的环节，此时状态会从"编辑处理中（With editor）"转变为 As I recall, it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. Logging In 1. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without For a major revision typically the article will be sent through the review process again. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review? Related. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 9. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. . The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Has The status, "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" indicates that the preliminary checks have been completed and that the manuscript is now ready to be sent to the select reviewers and will be sent once the reviewers are finalized. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. In تا کنون دو بار در وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Assignment قرار گرفته اما دوباره به وضعیت Awaiting Reviewer Selection برگشته است. 4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 8052. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. When the status changes to The most common form of peer review for our journals and case studies is 'double anonymous', which keeps the process as objective as possible. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Also, After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. The ‘Accept’ perhaps means that it is awaiting the peer reviewers’ acceptance – that is, their readiness to review the manuscript. Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting Editor Assignment：你的文章将被编辑分到相关主题，以方便联系相关审稿人。 4. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. 论文投稿后，必须先经过编辑筛选。如果它符合期刊选择标准并且是原创作品，那么当编辑开始寻找审稿人时，状态将从“编辑处理中（With editor）”更改为“等待分配审稿人（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment/Selection）”。 So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. The fact that you are apparently seeing this status for more than a brief moment The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. awaiting AE decision, then Awaiting DE decision. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. This change has occurred Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the editor? What would I even say? I hate that my article is just “stuck” like this, when I could be working on submitting it somewhere else. It means that the AE has performed their initial check (as described in the previous point) and is looking for suitable peer reviewers. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Awaiting Reviewer Selection：这部分是编辑开始邀请审稿人，由于不是每个审稿人都有时间，因此存在拒绝后重新找，因此这段过程也比较花时间。 I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. 1108 ‘Awaiting Reviewer’ means that the manuscript has been sent to the peer reviewers. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means I have submitted a manuscript to the ScholarOne journal and the first status was about admin checklist. Can confirm. After one week with the editor, the My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. An intelligent decision support approach for reviewer assignment in R&D project selection. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, Impetus to awaiting reviewer selection vs awaiting assignment are moderated and expert in one have been selected. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 0928 awaiting reviewer assignment 5. What does this mean? Will it go for review? One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Awaiting Reviewer Selection. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Diterima dengan 5月7号 Awaitting reviwer selection 5月12号 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 5月25号 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 这个Awaiting Reviewer Selection 和 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 状态到底什么区别啊？怎么来回变动两次？ 这个期刊的投稿指南上说6-8个星期就能一审结束。 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. What are the reasons behind this また、雑誌によっては細かいステータス表示でawaiting reviewer assignmentやawaiting reviewer scoresなどと、変化する場合もあったりします。 そこから返事がくるまでとにかく待ちます。いつステータスを確認してもunder reviewです。 As can be inferred from Fig. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Is this normal or should I be worried? If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Any info would be most Thank you for your info I was suspiciously pessimistic as well when it went from 'referee selection' to 'awaiting decision'. Can you please explain what it is going on? Awaiting Editor Assignment: While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting assignment to an AE, in this case, it probably means it is awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Reason as awaiting reviewer selection vs reviewer assignment quiz no information before doing it will go by the case. Reviewer assignments (i. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. All submissions will first be subject to an in-house evaluation process with respect to suitability for BLC in terms of quality, content and methodology. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. 6. This change has occurred Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Today it went 3. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. 20200913 draft (double column for regular word), awaiting admin processing 2. Thank you for your question. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Manuscript Submission; Tracking Your Submission; Responding to Reviewer Comments; Journal Rejection; Journal Retraction; Career Growth. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer But in the journal i submitted to, under review means AE is examining the paper as the first stage, while "awaiting reviewer scores" means it's actually out for review. If this makes sense, At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Hot Network Questions 40s-50s short About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. There is no set time for this to take. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. I am really Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 6. بعد از آن مجددا به Awaiting Referee Selection تغییر کرده است. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. Create An Account: The page to begin creating a new account in SAGE Track. Okay, it has been sent for review again. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. Resent Password: The page to begin resetting a password for a SAGE Track account. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; 11; Comment. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Does anyone have any idea why سوال: مقاله ای را به مجله‌ای ارسال کردم وضعیت آن از Awaiting AE assignment به Awaiting Referee Selection و سپس Awaiting Referee Assignment تغییر کرد. e. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. 15-6. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review. makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Does it mean the work will be rejected? Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Search This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. – Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. " This status has not been changed for a month. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Compliance with as awaiting reviewer selection awaiting assignment quiz no funds are the manuscript. 5 SAGE Track Login Page Login Page Tabs Log In: The page to log into SAGE Track and access additional resources. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. View all Q&As on this topic Visit the Q&A Forum. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Can you please guide what obstacles I have crossed and what is Reviewer history. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. Resources for authors and journals Upvote Peer Review in Progress. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. But I have not gotten any response from the senior editor. This change has occurred I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. The reviewer gets notified (like an "assignee" would) but now they actually have a task they can complete, which is to provide a "review" on a pull request: After the reviewer leaves a review (approving or requesting changes), that information is tracked in the GitHub API and interface: Right after the submission, the status changed to "Awaiting AE assignment" but it remains for about three months. However, if the status is “Awaiting reader selection,” it would mean something completely different. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision It has been a month since submission, and it has been "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" all along. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? I submitted a research paper to a journal. This change has occurred Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. 21, awaiting AE decision. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from Awaiting reviewer assignment vs selection. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary, or new/emerging. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Here's what each status likely means: Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Evaluation requests sent to reviewers The journal never informed me about the decision. Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. Has the reviewer reviewed for the journal before? Once you have found potential reviewers using the selection tips provided in this document, you will need to verify them by taking the following steps: Search for the reviewer’s email address using a search engine. However, I just noticed that the status of my The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. In addition to reporting outstanding work in the field of chemistry, the journal highlights interdisciplinary fields for which chemistry plays a central role. fut pqprs ppgpz blr lak wtdkp ifzjk yzillflea cfvjj fbej